The review can be a very common textual modality in university life or in the reality of an editor. If you know how to write a review, you should probably also know that there are challenges to be faced in search of note 10 content.Knowing this, we have developed a comprehensive step-by-step on writing best practices so that you have no difficulties and produce a perfect review. Let’s go?8 steps to a quality review8 steps to a quality review1. Be very clear about the definition of a reviewThis concept may seem silly at first glance, but it is important and valid to Philippines Phone Number List discuss whenever possible. Do you really know what a review is?It’s simple: the review can be defined as a type of text in order to analyze an object and write about it.This object can be an article published online or in academic journals, books, reports and films, among others.The objective is to work with the construction of descriptions, analysis, observations and development of a content that, in the end, will result in an opinion production, although that is not explicit.The reviews are interesting, because according to the reality of the author, his background in the area,
his opinions and point of view when coming into contact with that material, they will result in original and interesting content .Take the test: if you read 10 reviews about the same book, you can be sure that, even if they do not express some kind of opinion explicitly, they will have their particularities and will differ from each other. It is worth the exercise!Reviews can exist in two different ways: as descriptive reviews and as critical reviews. It is important to know how to clearly differentiate one from the other so as not to make mistakes when producing the text.
One of the characteristics of reviews is the size they should be.Even if there are no strictly rigid rules in this regard, it is interesting to produce content that is not very large since, otherwise, we would lose objectivity (which is very important in the production of a review).Knowing that it will be necessary to extract the main opinions from a large material (most of the time) and “summarize” it, it is important to have the discernment to see what deserves to go to the review and what can only be mentioned more distant.Be careful with the examples. The author can work with many case studies throughout the production, however, it is not your responsibility to transcribe each of them in the review.Give, in a broad way, which were the examples used and what they refer to. In this way, it standardizes the idea in a larger theme.3. Present what is the analyzed workDon’t confuse the reader. Clarify in the first lines of the text which is the highlighted work. It is also important to present the name of the author, the year of publication and other bibliographic information.In addition, it is important to highlight the structure of the object.
If it is a book, is it divided into chapters? What is the narrative mode of the text? If appropriate or necessary, it is also interesting to say, in a subtle way, the number of pages.